Science fiction is essentially involved with the longer term, however the style’s previous, dominated as it’s by white males, is more and more up for debate amongst a brand new era of writers. The most recent episode occurred this week, when the journal Analog Science Fiction and Truth stated it might drop John W. Campbell’s identify from its annual prize for greatest new author due to racist sentiments he had expressed.

Campbell ran the journal underneath its earlier identify, Astounding Science Fiction, from the late 1930s till his dying in 1971, and was one of many style’s most influential editors, working with such writers as Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke and Robert A. Heinlein. He was the writer of sci-fi underneath his personal identify and as Don A. Stuart.

He additionally wrote in help of segregation, referred to as slavery “a helpful academic system” and claimed black writers didn’t or couldn’t “write in open competitors,” along with making derogatory feedback about girls and homosexuality. In a 1998 essay, “Racism and Science Fiction,” the award-winning writer Samuel R. Delany recalled Campbell rejecting a submission of his, saying the editor “didn’t really feel his readership would be capable of relate to a black foremost character.”

The choice to take away Campbell’s identify from the award got here after this 12 months’s winner, Jeannette Ng, criticized him in her acceptance speech. “He’s accountable for setting a tone for science fiction that haunts this style to this very day,” she stated. “Stale, sterile, male, white, exalting within the ambitions of imperialists, colonialists, settlers and industrialists.”

Ng, who wrote the fantasy novel “Under the Pendulum Sun,” said in an interview on Wednesday that she was delighted by the decision. “It’s a good move away from honoring a completely obnoxious man who kept a lot of people out of the genre, who kept a lot of people from writing, who shaped the genre to his own image.” Thanks to the change, she added, “we’re now celebrating a little more neutrally a piece of history that’s not attached to his name.”

Alec Nevala-Lee, whose book “Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction” examines Campbell’s contributions to science fiction, also supported the change. “It was clearly the right call,” he said. “At this point, the contrast between Campbell’s racism and the diversity of the writers who have recently received the award was really just too glaring to ignore.”

Quachri credited Nevala-Lee’s book and Ng’s speech for pushing his publication, which is owned by Dell Magazines, to act. “Reading an early draft of Alec’s book is when I realized that the name change would need to happen eventually,” he said. Ng’s speech, he added, “really gave me a wonderful opportunity.”

For Nevala-Lee, it’s unavoidable that, as a creator of science fiction, Campbell would be judged by how well he anticipated societal changes. “He asked to be judged by the highest possible standard, as a man of the future,” Nevala-Lee said, “and I think he really fell short.”

Follow New York Times Books on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, join our publication or our literary calendar. And take heed to us on the E book Assessment podcast.